Post-crisis, you can’t just run a bank in the interests of shareholders.
Its astonishing to hear analysts expressing their pity for JPMorgan having to cough up what is likely to be some $13 billion for mis-sold mortgages. The press joined in: the New York Post went so far as to have its front page state: "US robs venerable bank". A figure of $13 billion might sound like a lot of money it is to the average reader but to JPMorgan its a drop in the ocean. The bank made that much in profits in the first two quarters of this year.
What bad sportsmanship by the US government to fine JPMorgan after begging it to bail out WaMu and Bear Stearns! And what signal does this send to other banks next time there is a needed bailout? So say the weeping analysts.
But back up for a moment. JPMorgan has made considerably more than $13 billion from the dodgy mortgages it sold before 2008 plus the gains from getting two institutions for a song. JPMorgan paid $1.9 billion for WaMu, which had $40 billion in shareholders equity, and made $2 billion on it immediately. Jamie Dimons bank also paid a measly $236 million for Bear Stearns while also getting the Federal Reserve to fund up to $30 billion of its risky assets.
If anyone lost out in those deals it was not JPMorgan. But at least this fine is of some credibility and will set the stage for banks in the future. Shareholders dont like fines at any time, but especially when they hit double-digit billions. And if an institution acts purely to give shareholders return rather than doing what is legal, then annoying its shareholders is really the only way to get it to act in line.