Retail FX clients get better price on execution than institutions, claims FXCM

Solomon Teague
Published on:

FXCM has compiled a study that, perhaps unsurprisingly, finds it offers better prices on execution than what is available to institutional clients on the big three FX trading platforms. The regulatory push away from OTC trading and towards exchanges is fundamentally misguided, the online broker concludes.

FXCM retail clients receive better prices for execution than institutional clients trading on the futures or interbank market, according to a study compiled by FXCM, the retail FX trading platform.

The study, which examined around 100 million trades going back a year on its own platform, as well as on three leading FX exchanges – the CME, Reuters and EBS – found FXCM was better than the equivalent quoted futures price on the CME 86.47% of the time. The prices were equal 4.36% of the time, while the CME offered better pricing 9.17% of the time.


Source: FXCM

In all, FXCM estimates the total savings to its clients are worth $36.35 million compared with what would have been available trading on the CME.

Source: FXCM

Similarly, in the interbank market, FXCM offered better pricing than the equivalent quoted interbank market 92.19% of the time, equal 3.12% of the time and inferior only 4.69% of the time. In this market, FXCM estimates a total saving to its clients worth $55.1 million.

While the findings look aggressive and the study is clearly self-serving, FXCM argues its methodology represents a conservative estimate of the price difference. The study compares its own actual fill order prices with time-stamp data provided by venues.

That means slippage is taken into account at the FXCM end, while it is assumed there was no slippage on the futures and interbank markets, despite the probability that slippage was higher in those venues given the larger orders. 

The study shows the price discrepancy is highest in the less liquid pairs. This is because it is easier for market makers to exit a position in more liquid markets, allowing them to price more aggressively.

The difference in pricing of execution is explained largely by the absence of predatory traders on the retail platform, says Drew Niv, CEO at FXCM. "Our liquidity providers are only allowed to be price makers for our retail clients and not price takers.

"Only our retail clients can take a price which protects the market maker from potentially being picked off by larger or faster predatory market takers, making them more comfortable and giving them the ability to make a market based on quality of price and liquidity rather than speed."

Free to trade

Ultimately, institutions are free to trade where they like, and they have the tools to analyse the pricing they are getting and how that compares across venues, says Brad Bailey, research director in the securities and investments group at Celent.

"There are a variety of providers that offer aggregated pricing or pure technology to create an appropriate means of comparing bids/offers from multiple counterparties," he says. "The key here for clients is to gain access to multiple counterparties, or access to multi-dealer platforms, where they can determine if they are getting competitive pricing."

While none of the ECNs mentioned in the report was willing to comment on it specifically, responses did draw attention to the inherent difficulties comparing such different markets. They stressed they offer their customers a full-value proposition which includes the safety and soundness of clearing, transparency and liquidity in their markets. 

Drew Niv-160x186
Drew Niv, FXCM
Niv accepts this point, stressing the findings do not suggest FXCM is superior to the larger trading venues, but that each has its own advantages that make it more suitable for certain types of clients. The three electronic trading networks play an important role servicing the largest global FX trading houses, he says, while the service they provide is not available elsewhere for comparable prices.

Similarly, he acknowledges high-frequency market making is also an essential ingredient of modern markets, and is fundamentally just an evolution of an age-old activity. Being market takers on the larger electronic communication networks (ECNs) allows them to be more effective market makers for clients like FXCM.

However, the study does show that the regulatory push to promote on-exchange, central limit order book trading at the expense of over the counter (OTC) trading is misguided, says Niv, adding. "The market used to have an equilibrium, but regulators have changed that by pushing things onto exchanges."

There is an assumption that the interbank market provides superior pricing. However, this is unclear because they do not publish data showing the prices at which trades for different clients were executed.