Cash Management Non-Financial Institutions Survey 2021
This is the 20th annual survey of the world's cash management industry. With an average response base in excess of 30,000, this is the most authoritative and comprehensive ranking available.
USE THE BELOW FILTER TO VIEW RESULTS IN THE CATEGORY OF YOUR CHOICE
If a ranking does not show this is because it didn't meet the minimum threshold requirement.
The re-use/distribution of any of the rankings requires the express permission of Euromoney Insight – please contact insight@euromoney.com if you wish to discuss this further.
Please select one
Please select one
Please select one
Domestic Results
Global Results
Regional Results
The Euromoney Cash Management Survey recognises the leading providers of cash management products and services. This year we collected 27,173 valid non-financial institution responses.
About the Cash Management Survey:
Euromoney’s Cash Management Survey receives responses from the leading cash managers, treasurers and financial officers worldwide, and is considered the benchmark survey for the global cash management industry. This is the most comprehensive guide to the cash management arena in the market
View Other transaction services Coverage
-
Quarterly survey reveals that UK finance professionals may be feeling more upbeat about prospects, but that this is yet to translate into a willingness to take greater risk onto balance sheets. -
The EU’s Instant Payments Regulation may have fired the starting gun on real-time payments in Europe, but many banks remain stuck in the blocks.
-
As banks retreat to their home markets, they must find reliable partners to serve corporate customers overseas or risk losing them.
-
The challenges around distributed ledger technology implementation and integration for bond issuance have proved more significant than early proponents had hoped.
-
Market conditions have heightened concerns over the potential cost of failed securities settlement as the world’s largest financial market prepares to move to T+1.
-
The decision by the US SEC to drop mandatory Scope 3 reporting weakens global emissions reporting standards. However, many corporate issuers are already using Scope 3 performance targets on sustainability-linked transactions for non-regulatory reasons. Are the debt and equities markets leading companies onto ESG ground upon which regulators fear to tread?
