The material on this site is for financial institutions, professional investors and their professional advisers. It is for information only. Please read our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy and Cookies before using this site.

All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2020 Euromoney, a part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.
Banking

Defusing PrivatBank: A very Ukrainian nationalization

It is almost a year since the forced nationalization of Ukraine’s biggest bank, whose collapse could have wreaked havoc with the country’s economy. It has cost the country $6 billion and sparked a wave of recriminations and lawsuits. As policymakers try to turn PrivatBank into a viable lender, here’s the inside story of a high-stakes national psychodrama.



PrivatBank-hurt-locker-600
Illustration: Paul Daviz


 

IN ADDITION        

Nationalizing any bank can be a tricky business. When the institution in question holds over a third of a country’s retail deposits and processes three quarters of its payments, the task could be fairly described as daunting. Add in powerful oligarch owners, endemic corruption and an economy still recovering from revolution and recession, and you have all the ingredients for a high-stakes national psychodrama. 

That is the situation the Ukrainian authorities found themselves in last December. PrivatBank, the country’s largest lender, had become a liability. Stress tests had raised serious concerns over the quality of the corporate loans that made up the vast majority of the bank’s assets, many of which had been pledged as security against emergency refinancing from the central bank.

Repeated pleas to the bank’s largest shareholders, Igor Kolomoisky and his business partner Gennadiy Bogolyubov, to restructure and collateralize the loans had been largely ignored. The National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) was warning of a potentially disastrous capital shortage. 

The IMF, Ukraine’s main financial backer since the 2014 Maidan revolution, was pushing hard for nationalization. Other international financial institutions (IFIs) involved in the rehabilitation of Ukraine, including the EBRD and IFC, also backed the move. PrivatBank’s owners, however, were fighting it tooth and nail. 

Kolomoisky, arguably Ukraine’s most influential oligarch, was claiming to have met all the NBU’s requirements and vehemently rejected the need for a state takeover.





You have reached premium content. Please log in to continue reading.

Read beyond the headlines with Euromoney

For over 50 years, our readers have looked to Euromoney to stay informed about the issues that matter in the international banking and financial markets. Find out more about our different levels of acces below.

SUBSCRIBE ONLINE TODAY

Unlimited access to Euromoney.com and Asiamoney.com

Expert comment, long reads and in-depth analysis interviews with senior finance professionals

Access the results of our market-leading annual surveys across core financial services

Access the results of our annual awards, including the world-renowned Awards for Excellence

Your print copy of Euromoney magazine delivered monthly

£68.33 per month

Billed Annually

FREE 7 DAY TRIAL

Unlimited access to Euromoney.com and Asiamoney.com, including our top stories, long reads, expert analysis, and the results of our annual surveys and awards

Sign up to any of our newsletters, curated by our editors

LOGIN NOW

Already a user?

We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree