Since announcing its Arabian adventure, Barclays has suffered an avalanche of negative press coverage. I will therefore limit my comments to a few pertinent points.
Is it my imagination or have you noticed how low key the good Germans have become?
Bank bonuses and corporate hospitality
Corporate hospitality is a receding memory. I was not surprised that the Morgan Stanley London press reception was so well attended.
Marry in haste, repent at leisure.
Why are these bankers announcing appointments before the deal has been approved by shareholders?
I was wrong yet I was right. In my November column, I criticized Barclays decision to spurn the governments bail-out package. I wrote: "If the worst comes to the worst (which it could) and Barclays cant raise capital in the elongated elected time-frame from the private sector, it will have to prostrate itself before Gordon Brown."
Two days after the magazine went to press, Barclays announced that it was raising £7 billion of capital from Abu Dhabi and Qatar. So far, so good. The only problem is that the reserve capital instruments are very expensive (Barclays is paying a coupon of 14% for 10.5 years and offering the Arabs warrants) and more expensive than the money on offer from the UK government. The capital-raising also spat in the eye of substantial UK shareholders that were not offered a chance to participate, in breach of the pre-emption convention.
It is not my policy to kick those who are in agony rolling in the mud. I prefer to be in the vanguard of assaulting the unassailable rather than throwing tomatoes as the mobs mood turns ugly. Since announcing its Arabian adventure, Barclays has suffered an avalanche of negative press coverage. I will therefore limit my comments to a few pertinent points.
The past year has pummelled us all. However, those who will live to fight another day are those who maintain their credibility. Varleys credibility has been badly damaged not least because Barclays has undertaken four capital-raisings in 15 months. In August 2007 China Development Bank and Temasek invested 3.6 billion at a punchy share price of £7.20. Today, the shares touched an all-time low of £1.20. I shudder to think of the glacial atmosphere when the Asians come to tea to discuss their strategic investment.
Barclays announced in its recent interim management statement that "group profit before tax for the nine months ended September 30 2008 was slightly ahead of 2007". Isnt that baffling? We all know that some very clever people work at Barclays but are they the brightest people on Wall Street? I cant think of another big financial institution that has reported a higher profit for 2008 than 2007: not Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, JPMorgan or Morgan Stanley. Although it is good to be an outlier, being that much of an outlier is odd.
In November, I also criticized Barclays for purchasing a haunch of bankrupt Lehman and bloating headcount just as the investment banking industry was heading for the incinerator. My hunch is that Varley cannot say no to the charismatic Diamond. But Varleys job is to lead not follow. In the past month, banking lay-offs have ballooned and the atmosphere on trading floors has gone from sombre to suicidal. So for Barclays to have added 10,000 more bodies in September hints at bad timing, bad judgement or just bad luck. A mole makes an interesting point. Barclays employed nearly every one who worked for Lehmans US operation but bought only a very small proportion of the Lehman balance sheet. So effectively there was a disconnect at the outset: the Lehman balance sheet supported the employees in their various functions (for example, leveraged loans or prime brokerage). If these individuals dont have access to the money, the amount of business they can write will be constrained. Moreover, the Lehman model was highly dependent on leverage, and now leverage is as redundant as fiscal restraint. I therefore expect many more redundancies at Barclays Capital.
It is a relief to turn from beleaguered Barclays to Delphic Deutsche Bank. Is it my imagination or have you noticed how low key the good Germans have become? In February 2006, I remember seeing a prominent Financial Times piece about Anshu Jain, the co-head of Deutsches investment bank. The article, Deutsche Banks pioneer shows his strength, was fulsome in its praise of the investment bank where profits for 2005 had risen to 4.8 billion (up 50% on 2004). I re-read the article with a wry smile. "Mr Jain remains the star. His operations are reckoned to contribute a good half of Deutsches underlying group profit... Analysts applaud him for pioneering the trend away from standard credit default swaps and towards complex pooled derivatives, such as collateralized debt obligations, which can be used to fine-tune the risks of an investors portfolio on one side and generate bigger, more stable profits for the bank on the other." Jain is quoted as insisting that Deutsche makes only 15% of its profits from bets and 60% from "clever stuff", apparently double the amount other investment banks make from clever stuff. And Jain envisaged a rosy future for his troops: "First he sees growth opportunities in the US... and in developing economies, such as South Africa, Russia, Turkey, India and China but also in product areas such as mortgage-backed securities." At the time, Deutsches share price hovered around 90. Today it closed below 20. Perhaps not so clever?
From that article, one would assume that, at the peak of the market, Jain believed that Deutsche was insulated from any market downturn. Of course, Jain was not alone in his view. Very few senior managers predicted the calamitous reversal of the cycle. But hang on a minute, wasnt Anshu meant to be much brighter than the rest of us?
Deutsches investment bank has made a loss for each of the past three quarters and so far this year has lost nearly 1.9 billion. Im not sure even the most sympathetic commentator would classify that as clever. Deutsche has announced write-downs in the investment bank of approximately $11 billion. However, in the third quarter, the bank had a change of heart and made use of a new accounting rule to reclassify almost 25 billion of assets, so avoiding a 845 million hit to revenues. This enabled Deutsche to record a profit for the third quarter of 2008 instead of a loss. Perhaps that was clever? Nevertheless, UBS, when it reported its third-quarter profits, refused to make use of the same convention on the grounds that "investors would see through it". Rajeev Misra, Deutsches head of credit, left the firm in June 2008. Sources insist that he left of his own volition. However, third-quarter results refer to trading losses of 873 million in credit proprietary trading. I wonder who is to blame for that? An insider insists: "Deutsche has been a relative outperformer during this crisis. And if you look at the most recent results for the fixed-income sales and trading area (run by Jain), revenues were up 60% on last year."
Deutsche, alone of the big banks, has not raised significant additional capital. However, its decision in September to purchase about 30% of Postbank is a tacit recognition that the quest for "clever stuff" is over. Never have slender but transparent returns from retail banking looked so attractive. Jain and his co-head of the investment bank, Michael Cohrs, are both still members of Deutsches global executive committee. It is good to know that, despite the poor market conditions, Jain has time to focus on things outside work. A passionate cricket fan, earlier this year he purchased a stake in an Indian Premier League cricket team. Is that perhaps a hint that he sees his future in India rather than Europe? At one time, Jain was viewed as a strong contender to succeed Deutsches chief executive, Josef Ackermann. Today, these chances look as if they have been knocked for six.
Is forgoing your bonus the new black?
Of course, Christmas has officially been cancelled and corporate hospitality is a receding memory. I was therefore not surprised that the late-October Morgan Stanley press reception at the Wallace Collection in London was so well attended. Champagne was plentiful but canapés were scarce. Many senior Stanleyites were there, including the charming co-president, Walid Chammah, and the talented co-head of global investment banking Franck Petitgas. I was impressed by Morgan Stanleys chief financial officer, Colm Kelleher, who was both articulate and amusing. Although he must have been under a lot of stress during the preceding month, he seemed much more relaxed than the journalists swarming around him.
Talking about individuals who are excellent company, I am delighted that Jean-Pierre Mustier, the former head of Société Générales investment bank, has a new role. He recently took over the banks amorphous asset management franchise. "Hes obviously ferociously intelligent," a mole whispers. "I assume hes really going to shake things up." Next year it will also be interesting to see how the French firms investment bank fares under its new leader, ex-Bear Stearns employee Michel Péretié. I was also intrigued to learn that Société Générale has a woman, Diony Lebot, in charge of its Americas operations.
Marry in haste, repent at leisure.
This is my last column for 2008. For financial markets and financial firms, it has been a slow, agonizing grind downwards. The crisis has produced more zeroes than heroes. And the unimaginable has occurred. As the magazine goes to press, stock markets are re-testing their lows for the year and credit markets are once again in crisis. "This will turn around next spring," a source said. "By then, not one person will have a scintilla of hope left." I for one am thrilled to see the back of 2008 and I wish all my readers a very prosperous, healthy and happy 2009.
Please send news and views to firstname.lastname@example.org.