Enterprising approach for pub sector


Louise Bowman
Published on:

Europe’s real estate revolution

It is an age-old question: which is more important – beer or rent? The news that one of the UK’s pub groups is actively examining the merits of conversion to a Reit throws the potential of these vehicles wide open. But the concept faces significant hurdles in that it would require the UK government to accept that beer income is equivalent to rental income. Reit legislation dictates that 75% of taxable income must be derived from rental income.

In its interim results at the end of May, Enterprise Inns revealed that it was considering the move, but accepted that, though there were “significant barriers”, it was “worth further investigation”. The company is understood to have mandated Merrill Lynch to investigate the potential of conversion, but the US bank declined to comment.

Pub companies have significant real estate holdings – something that they have long been expected to exploit. The industry quickly embraced whole business securitization in the 1990s but has proved more reluctant to adopt the wholesale separation of real estate and operational business. Indeed, Karim Naffah, finance director at one of the UK’s largest managed pub chains, Mitchells & Butler, has stated that (in an environment absent of Reits) the sale of pub freeholds via sale/leasebacks is not something that he would consider: “Given the fact that pubs are generally valued as a multiple of sales and profits, capturing the asset appreciation from our successful trading for shareholders is a key part of our strategy.” Naffah says that the company might therefore consider Reits in future.

If a pub company was to convert to a Reit the logical move would be for the business to be split into two companies, with the real estate assets going into one, which then converts.

Such a move would only really be feasible for tenanted estates (such as Enterprise) as the beer/rent split on managed estates would be too weighted towards beer.

Enterprise Inns itself has £3.46 billion net debt, which includes fixed rate securitized bonds via the Unique Pub Company programme. These could certainly be refinanced more cheaply but this would involve breaking their Spens clauses. British Land has, however, done just this with its Werretown Supermarkets refinancings, so it would certainly be no surprise if Unique decided to do the same.

More on Real estate:

Real estate: A false sense of security
Investors can’t get enough of real estate. But property developers should get ready for the wall of money to shift to emerging markets.

European CMBS: Chips with everything  
The recent explosive growth in European CMBS is the fruit of years of investment in the product by many banks. But do these institutions now find their hands tied by the need to feed the machine that they have created?

Real estate awards 2006: A perfect storm  
It offers double-digit yields, is not correlated with the equity market and provides secure, long-term returns. Allocations of investment capital to real estate have therefore ballooned – and look set to keep on growing.