New payment channels fail to undermine bank enthusiasm for corporate cards

Solomon Teague
Published on:

Banks remain as committed as ever to their corporate-card franchises, despite the emergence of new payment channels, including mobile-payment technologies that some argue could ultimately make cards redundant.

“New payment channels are raising the awareness of, and the acceptance of, a changing payment landscape, in both the supply and demand sides,” says Alejandro Stein, managing director of global commercial payments at Barclaycard.

Though the aim of new payment channels is often the elimination of cash – not cards – from transactions, cards have had to innovate to keep pace. “The corporate cards’ value proposition has been enhanced, especially as commercial cards move from plastic to virtual and buyer-initiated payments,” says Peggy Yankovich, global head of corporate cards at HSBC.

Corporate cards remain a fiercely contested space for banks. There is everything to play for as corporates look to simplify processes with a single card provider. “In some cases we are seeing a consolidation on to traditional corporate cards with expenditure responsibility targeted at the individual and the process audited accordingly,” says Stein.

“In other cases we are seeing a shift to e-payments and forms of central travel booking and business-to-business payments in order to take process and responsibility away from the individual.”

He adds: “The fact is that different customers respond to these challenges differently and they need a mix of solutions that provide them with control, convenience and good reconciliation capability.”

The consolidation of corporate-card arrangements has particularly important consequences, given their ever-broader geographical scope. In many cases, corporates are replacing a patchwork of separate deals across multiple locations with a single global solution as they respond to a shifting cost and risk landscape.

Companies are looking further afield for business opportunities, making global coverage of paramount importance. Five years ago, around 20% of corporate-card clients required global coverage, rising to 85% today, according to Kevin Phalen, head of global card and comprehensive payables at Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAML).

It is therefore important to choose a card provider with a global footprint, ensuring cards will be accepted wherever they go, and that they meet the diverse technological and regulatory requirements specific to those local jurisdictions. Most obviously, US-based employees travelling in Europe need a card with chip-and-pin functionality as well as a metallic strip.

“We are constantly examining our fraud-detection capabilities and the way in which we service our customers,” says Stein. “The global nature of business travel means that we always need to consider servicing hours and the manner in which that service is provided, be that via telephone or self-service via mobile or web.

“As business expands globally, we are striving to deliver our service more locally.”

Rolls-Royce recently mandated BAML as corporate-card provider in a global deal, replacing a patchwork of separate deals in the many locations it operates in, having originally considered nine providers.

Rolls-Royce was unhappy with its former card provider and attributes this in part to an inadequate due-diligence process. In its original RFP, it only asked 10 questions, says George Castlehow, global process owner for employee reimbursement at Rolls-Royce, speaking at the recent Business Travel Show in London.

This time around it asked bidders 137 questions on issues ranging from the stability of the provider and coverage, to IT security and options for varying spending limits. “Cost was not the main driver,” he says.

By ensuring all employees that incur business expenses have corporate cards, corporates reduce the demand for cash advances and improve the quality of data they hold on expenses, allowing them to better manage costs and identify where money is being spent, says Rod Richardson, travel manager at The Wellcome Trust.

Having recently signed a new corporate-card deal with AirPlus, ensuring all the Trust’s business travellers have a corporate card, it has reduced cost leakage from around 8% to under 3%, says Richardson.

Where employees use personal cards to make purchases and later claim it back on expenses, management lose important data that can help them better understand where money is being spent, he says.

For many firms, management information (MI) data provided by the card issuers and credit card companies are becoming a deciding factor in provider selection. Even when they are not, having quality MI feedback is proving to add considerable value and increase client satisfaction.

“We weren’t even aware we wanted MI data, but have found it really useful since we had it,” says Richardson.

In many cases, simplicity reduces cost in the longer term, encouraging corporate-card users to stay on top of expenses, which reduces late-payment fees and increases rebates, says Ike Ihenacho, manager for global travel expense and meetings at Mondelez International.

A system that allows expenses to be filed as they are incurred means employees will be reimbursed quicker for any cash expenses they make, and reduces the time spent in the office filling in expense forms, he adds.