Keep an eye on Mexico – it has always been an interesting banking market.
It is dominated by foreign banks, and the one major domestically owned bank has, at times, frustrated local regulators, whose desire for credit growth has been thwarted by risk-averse decisions taken overseas.
More often than not, in those admittedly infrequent times, this has been part of a global risk strategy – cutting back in regions, or emerging markets, and leading to weak risk appetite for the credit needed to grow the Mexican economy.
However, times have changed.
Mexico’s positive real interest rates now shine like a beacon for the international banks that are mired in low or negative interest rate markets elsewhere. And so it’s risk-on time for those banks that now seemingly desire scale in Mexico.
Meanwhile, the leaders BBVA grew 5% and Banorte by -3%, while in the second tier Santander Mexico grew by 3% and Banamex by -1%, all below the system’s 6% – and that aggregate was clearly pulled higher by the aggressive expansion of the challengers’ growth in loans.
HSBC and Scotia grew largely by buying market share from the leaders, though there is the assumption that lower-risk scoring controls at these banks must be playing a role, too.
It’s an interesting strategy and one to keep an eye on. The move to win market share is in part a strategic necessity: the lack of scale of HSBC and Scotia in Mexico impacts return on equity (ROE), with 11.9% and 10.6% respectively. This compares with BBVA’s ROE of 23.6% and Banorte’s 26.4%, but will this bid for scale succeed?
On the one hand, the stagnant economy is expected to begin to grow again and low credit penetration suggests there is room to expand total loans.
On the other hand, the reticence of the leaders to respond is a warning sign, and a Bank of America survey of fund managers published in November found that 73% of respondents think Mexico is going to lose its investment-grade status – suggesting negative credit conditions on the horizon.