Choosing Greenpeace over clients: the new banking reality
Euromoney, is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024
Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Choosing Greenpeace over clients: the new banking reality

Banks are learning about the damage that being on the wrong side of environmental issues can cause.

HA banner new 660px

There’s trouble afoot with the expansion of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain Pipeline. Some 26 banks from Canada, the US, Japan, Europe and China have committed about $7.25 billion to the project that plans to expand the 1,150 kilometre route of the existing pipeline through Canada – bumping up its capacity from 300,000 to 890,000 barrels of oil a day. 

It was approved by the Canadian government at the end of last year, but, in echoes of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), the project already faces 19 court challenges launched by First Nations, environmental groups and the cities of Vancouver and Burnaby. 

One has to bet prime minister Justin Trudeau has upped his yoga commitment these days. Having positioned himself as a progressive, compassionate leader who welcomes Syrian refugees and bangs the drum for women, ethnic minorities and the LGBT community, he is now supporting a pipeline that impacts indigenous people and will increase the production of fossil fuels. 


Protesters in Canada’s cities are reminding him of that conflict. But faced with provinces where jobs and taxes depend on the pipeline and having reviewed its environmental impact, the pipeline won. 

Gift this article