Latin American derivatives: Suitability debate
Euromoney, is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024
Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Latin American derivatives: Suitability debate

Mexico and Brazil come to terms with meaning of exotic

Central banks save the day

Banks won’t be fooled again

Some Brazilian CFOs have lost their jobs because of Tarns (target redemption notes, or swaps or forwards), notably at Sadia and Aracruz. Now more aptly nicknamed the products from hell, they account for losses across many emerging markets including Brazil, Mexico, Korea, Poland and Indonesia. A fundamental question stands at the heart of the debate about these products: were the firms speculating or hedging with them? And did the banks acting as derivatives dealers intend to meet their clients’ needs or to deceive unsophisticated CFOs with complex asymmetrical products?

The Tarns provided a long position in local currency for corporates. The derivatives generated monthly payments for a period of one or two years, with the investor gaining from an upward movement in the underlying price and registering losses from a downward movement. Potential gains were capped, with many contracts carrying a knock-out provision if the foreign currency appreciated beyond a specified range. However, in contrast, potential losses were not only unlimited but could occur at a rate that was usually twice as fast as the decline in the underlying exchange rate.

Gift this article