| Troika Dialog corporate governance profiles of leading Russian companies | ||||||||
| Company | Market cap 17 Aug 01 ($mn) | Transparency | Accountability | Investor relations | Discipline | Conduct | Exposure to potential corporate governance risk | |
| Aeroflot | Transport | 286 | Low | Poor | Adequate | Strong | Flawed | Fair to vulnerable |
| AvtoVAZ | Manufacturing | 257.9 | Low | Poor | Inefficient | Fair | Unsatisfactory | Vulnerable to high |
| Baltika* | Beer | 541.2 | High | Good | Adequate | Fair | Flawed | Fair to vulnerable |
| Bashinformsvyaz | Telecoms | 80.5 | Moderate | Fair | Adequate | Fair | Flawed | Fair to vulnerable |
| Bashkirenergo | 85.8 | Moderate | Poor | Adequate | Weak | Flawed | Vulnerable to high | |
| Chelyabenergo | Electricity | 34.5 | Moderate | Fair | Adequate | Weak | Satisfactory | Fair to vulnerable |
| Chelyabinsk SI | Telecoms | 62.6 | Moderate | Fair | Adequate | Fair | Unsatisfactory | Fair to vulnerable |
| FESCO | Transport | 18 | Low | Poor | Inefficient | Fair | Flawed | Vulnerable to high |
| GAZ | Manufacturing | 85.2 | Moderate | Poor | Adequate | Weak | Unsatisfactory | Vulnerable to high |
| Gazprom* | Oil&Gas | 11,441.40 | Low | Fair | Inefficient | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair to vulnerable |
| Golden Telecom* | Telecoms | 279.1 | High | Good | Adequate | Strong | Satisfactory | Low to fair |
| GUM | Consumer&Retail | 97.5 | Low | Good | Adequate | Weak | Flawed | Fair to vulnerable |
| Irkutskenergo | Electricity | 376.6 | ||||||
