Jump To
Received wisdom has it that corporate Japan is changing. The days of trophy acquisitions for status rather than shareholder value are behind us, we are told. Today’s corporate titans listen to shareholders, divest non-core assets and focus on their core strengths.
Broadly, that has been the direction of recent years, as illustrated by Olympus, Fujitsu, Takeda Pharmaceuticals and more broadly by Japan’s corporate governance code. Until recently, Toshiba, troubled but rebuilding, was thought to be part of that welcome new direction.
But now there are doubts, which have crystallized in some alarming ways.
In December, Toshiba’s two biggest shareholders, independently of one another, called for emergency shareholder meetings for different reasons.
One, Effissimo Capital Management, is seeking an investigation of the firm’s AGM on July 31, at which it is alleged that Toshiba’s third-largest shareholder, Harvard Management Company, was pressured into abstaining in an action that had direct consequences for a knife-edge vote...
Access this research
Enter your work email address to sign in or check whether your organisation already has access to Euromoney.
