The truth about Asian investment banking
The money network:

The money network:

Why crowdfunding threatens traditional bank lending

December 2009

Email a Friend

  • All fields are compulsory


To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';'





Add Your Comment


  • All fields are compulsory
  • All comments are subject to editorial review as we are subject to the same regulations adhered to in publishing our own content. For this reason, your comment may not be live immediately, or may not be published.






I have read and agree to the Terms and Conditions





Debt trading poll 2009: Methodology



Debt trading poll 2009
Balance sheet counts in debt trading
Market share Best for liquidity provision
Investment grade High yield
Credit Default Swaps Credit derivatives indices
Bank proprietary/Multi-dealer platforms -
Overall and service categories

Methodology


Votes are sorted in descending order of stated total trading volumes and weighted as follows:

Factor of 4 applied to voters in first (top) quartile of trading volumes
Factor of 3 applied to voters in second quartile
Factor of 2 applied to voters in third quartile
Factor of 1 (unity) applied to voters in fourth quartile

Nominated firms were then scored 4:3:2 for first, second and third place votes respectively.

Overall ranking by market share: based on the total volume of business placed annually with each bank. We asked respondents to estimate the proportion of their total annual debt trading business placed with their five top counterparties. Total business placed with each service provider across all questionnaires received is then divided by total business on all questionnaires.

Multi-dealer platforms – service categories: Voters rate their provider from one to seven across service categories. The scores for each category are averaged to produce a category score for each provider rated.

We received 373 responses of which 301 were verified. Total notional trading volume of respondents that submitted that figure was $751 billion.

Respondent type: Percentage
Bank     40.83
Mutual fund/unit trust     20.42
Other asset manager     14.88
Insurance company     7.96
Hedge fund     7.61
Pension fund     6.23
Central bank     1.04
Government investment agency     1.04

If you have any questions about the survey, please contact Tim Moxon, head of research: tmoxon@euromoneyplc.







Download the Free Euromoney iPad app today