Bond Connect and the first 30 days
Euromoney, is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024
Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Sponsored Content

Bond Connect and the first 30 days

Sponsored by


The latest access channel between the Hong Kong and China financial markets went live on July 3 with the launch of the northbound Bond Connect – connecting international investors with the China Interbank Bond Market (CIBM). Previous China market access platforms – such as Stock Connect – have typically started slowly as investors exercise initial caution, before attracting proper momentum.




Barnaby Nelson

Regional Head of Securities Services for Greater China and Northeast Asia 

The early signs in the latest “Connect” undertaking appear promising with Rmb7 billion of mainland bonds traded on the first day alone(1), and around 140 investors registered to use the access channel. These are unprecedented transactional volumes in comparison to previous market openings in China, and while trading activity has fallen slightly since, it remains stable. 

It is anticipated that the number of Bond Connect registered investors will rise to between 400 and 500 by year-end. If these numbers are reached, the Bond Connect programme will have surpassed the number of registered investors under each of the established Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII), RMB Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (RQFII) and the CIBM Direct schemes within six months. But what have been the core drivers for this interest, and what improvements and remedies need to be made? We assess how Bond Connect has fared over its first 30 days and look ahead to the future of China’s latest market access scheme, as it continues on its voyage of RMB internationalization.

Bond Connect: Investors jump at the opportunity

China’s $9 trillion bond market has long been underweight by foreign institutional investors(2) but this is likely to change amid Bond Connect interest from a broad spectrum of asset allocators including fund management houses, insurance companies and pension plans globally who are looking to take advantage of this latest quota-free access channel. 

Standard Chartered Bank, for example, has helped support a number of clients with Bond Connect trading including China Merchants Securities, GF Global Capital, Manulife Asset Management and Taikang Asset Management in Hong Kong.(3) Following day one, Standard Chartered has held market briefings in every leading global RMB investment centre during the first two weeks of trading, revealing unprecedented interest in this new mechanism. This is down to several factors. 

First, the launch was well-handled by the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) and Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) who proactively engaged with the industry in the eight-week lead up to the go-live date. This proactivity and transparency created predictability, which allowed financial institutions such as Standard Chartered, to fully support Bond Connect’s implementation seamlessly. 

The regulators have aimed to use Hong Kong as an “adaptor” to CIBM under Bond Connect – striving to find areas which can be adjusted to assist with integrating international investors into a historically domestic market. The option to settle on a T+2 cycle was introduced in time for launch and was used by 80% of the market on day one. This demonstrates the lessons learnt from Stock Connect where the mandatory T+0/T+1 settlement cycle caused significant challenges for international investors.

Second, registration for Bond Connect is also straightforward, with authorization usually granted within two weeks. While the time it takes to apply to trade directly onshore through the CIBM has improved, Bond Connect offers an offshore, fairly frictionless solution which is appealing to international investors. 

“Many institutions simply prefer to access China’s bond market through Hong Kong, where they have established custodian and banking relationships and understand the Common Law legal system. I anticipate flows through Bond Connect will jump significantly as passive funds increase their exposures off the back of China’s probable inclusion into major bond indices such as Bloomberg Barclays, Citi, and JPMorgan. These passive providers will want quick entry into the market through Bond Connect as opposed to CIBM, at least initially,” said Julia McKenny, Head, Market Advocacy, Securities Services, Transaction Banking at Standard Chartered. 

Lastly, end investor demand for returns has played a major role in driving fund managers into the Chinese onshore bond market. Yields in onshore corporate debt are more attractive than US Treasury Bills or European sovereign debt instruments, which pay out limited or even negative interest.

The development continues…

Bond Connect is still in its initial pilot phase, and industry experts are working closely with clients and regulators to ensure that the platform evolves quickly to meet with a range of international regulatory standards.

“Standard Chartered has played a unique role in working with the industry and key regulators to ensure that the Bond Connect is quickly recognized as an investment mechanism for European-domiciled funds, under the terms of UCITS V and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) and we continue to lead the industry and regulatory discussions to facilitate resolution,” said McKenny.

Following the publication of the “Bond Connect and UCITS V” position paper, Standard Chartered has facilitated briefings in London, Luxembourg and Dublin to ensure that the mechanism and its development were fully understood by key regulators and industry leaders. These discussions have highlighted a small number of high-priority development requirements, which are now being worked on.

In particular, a short-term concern raised is settlement risk, and the absence of true delivery versus payment (DVP) for one of the two bond depositories in China, although industry experts are confident this shortfall will be resolved during 2017. A system enabling true DVP for depositories is a core requirement for key regulatory approvals, as it will minimize counterparty risk for managers of UCITS and AIFs, and their depositary service providers, who take on liability for assets held in custody.

Also ongoing is confirmation of how beneficial ownership rights will be enforced and whether the HKMA’s Central Moneymarkets Unit (CMU) will be recognized as a central securities depository (CSD) under UCITS’ definitions. As with Stock Connect, these issues depend largely on legal validation of existing processes and clarification by CMU on this matter is expected imminently. 

Taxation has also been an area rife with equivocality. Investors using QFII and RQFII have long questioned whether they need to accrue for withholding taxation or if they are required to unwind previous accruals. While Stock Connect provides an exemption on the issue, there is still limited understanding about how withholding tax is treated.

“As with all new mechanisms, other smaller operational challenges remain, such as the ability to block trade using the electronic RFQ platform, for example. But the strong performance of trading on day one of the Bond Connect is strong evidence that even today’s pilot model is robust and usable for international investors,” commented James O’Sullivan, Head of Securities Services Hong Kong & Head of C&C Product GCNA at Standard Chartered. 

Conclusion: A good start and much more to come

Initial interest in Bond Connect has been strong and with more key developments still to come in 2017 and beyond, we expect interest to convert into significant volume growth very quickly. Leveraging the invaluable experience of the Stock Connect, this project has begun with an unprecedented level of regulatory clarity and engagement. With leading players in both Europe and China entirely clear on what needs to be done, we should expect UCITS regulators to be able to move quickly towards approval of the Bond Connect for funds under their supervision.

A month into trading now, we have indeed witnessed the successful launch of a unique access mechanism for China; the global investment community has warmly embraced this development, and Standard Chartered remains front and centre in continuing to contribute to its success.

[1] Bloomberg (July 11, 2017) – So Far, So Good for China’s Bond Connect

[2] Standard Chartered (2016) – RMB Investors Forum White Paper: Rise of Next Generation China Access

[3] Standard Chartered (July 3, 2017) – Standard Chartered supports clients on Bond Connect debut    

 Barnaby Nelson
About the Author 

Barnaby Nelson is Regional Head of Securities Services, Greater China and North East Asia, for Transaction Banking at Standard Chartered.In this role, he leads the end-to-end delivery of Standard Chartered Securities Services proposition in several of the Bank’s largest custody businesses across product development, sales, client servicing and operations. 

Barnaby is also responsible for driving the business agenda amongst institutional investor and financial intermediary clients across North East Asia and Greater China, with a focus on supporting clients’ growth aspirations across Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

Barnaby joined the bank from BNP Paribas, where he was Head of Client Development - Asia for the Securities Services division. Prior to this, he worked as Business Owner for Thomson Reuters’ information and market data feeds in Asia-Pacific.


This material has been prepared by Standard Chartered Bank (SCB), a firm authorised by the United Kingdom’s Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. It is not independent research material. This material has been produced for information and discussion purposes only and does not constitute advice or an invitation or recommendation to enter into any transaction.

Some of the information appearing herein may have been obtained from public sources and while SCB believes such information to be reliable, it has not been independently verified by SCB. Information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Any opinions or views of third parties expressed in this material are those of the third parties identified, and not of SCB or its affiliates.

SCB does not provide accounting, legal, regulatory or tax advice. This material does not provide any investment advice. While all reasonable care has been taken in preparing this material, SCB and its affiliates make no representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness, and no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors of fact, omission or for any opinion expressed herein. You are advised to exercise your own independent judgment (with the advice of your professional advisers as necessary) with respect to the risks and consequences of any matter contained herein. SCB and its affiliates expressly disclaim any liability and responsibility for any damage or losses you may suffer from your use of or reliance on this material.

SCB or its affiliates may not have the necessary licenses to provide services or offer products in all countries or such provision of services or offering of products may be subject to the regulatory requirements of each jurisdiction. This material is not for distribution to any person to which, or any jurisdiction in which, its distribution would be prohibited.

You may wish to refer to the incorporation details of Standard Chartered PLC, Standard Chartered Bank and their subsidiaries at

© Copyright 2017  Standard Chartered Bank. All rights reserved. All copyrights subsisting and arising out of these materials belong to Standard Chartered Bank and may not be reproduced, distributed, amended, modified, adapted, transmitted in any form, or translated in any way without the prior written consent of Standard Chartered Bank

Gift this article