An introduction to FX algorithms
Development of technology combined with reduced bilateral credit friction has contributed to the fragmenting of liquidity into many different pools. These developments have added to the complexity of currency trading, say Toby Cole, managing director FX client advisory group and Jeremy Smart, global head of electronic distribution at RBS.
|By Toby Cole, managing director FX client advisory group and Jeremy Smart, global head of electronic distribution at RBS.|
To enter an FX world increasingly devoted to electronic trading is to risk confusion as well as capital.
Firms are increasingly under pressure to provide the best ‘all-in price’ for clients and high quality execution.
The recent spate of law suits brought by pension funds relating to excessive charging for FX trades brings further resonance to an Asset Manager’s desire to receive competitive pricing and high quality execution.
As a result, it has never been more important to think about your current FX execution policy and grasp the fundamental concepts underpinning FX algorithms. Already widespread, use of these techniques is set to grow further.
The term algorithmic trading is a catch-all covering two different types of strategies.
1. Trading strategies
This is where technology is used to determine a trading requirement. It can be programmed to follow different trading strategies to suit the users’ risk appetite.
An example would be asking the system to buy CHFJPY when the 30-day moving average of USDJPY crosses the 30-day moving average of USDCHF. Algorithmic trading can be high or low frequency. High frequency trading is a subset of algorithmic trading focused on market-making.
2. Execution strategies
These are used to execute trades into the market in a manner which helps to minimise market impact and transaction costs. The technology can offer a huge range of different execution styles, with strategies selected according to the risk appetite of the client and the market conditions at the point of execution.
A simple example would be selling a currency pair using a time slice order. The algorithm will slice the order into pre-determined pieces of risk to trade at specified time intervals. Although this spreads the time over which the execution takes place, the smaller order sizes help to limit the transaction costs involved.
To fully appreciate the need for algorithmic execution and the opportunities for algorithmic trading it is necessary to understand how technology has already transformed the FX world. Once the FX trading between dealers was dominated by only two systems, EBS and Reuters. Now there are many trading venues, some open to clients as well as banks, such as CME, Currenex, Hotspot and Lava.
The development of this market structure and the availability of liquidity in electronic form has encouraged banks to invest in their own single-dealer platforms and in the automated engines that manage the risk. There is an increasing trend among major liquidity providers to internalise flow, matching buyers and sellers and warehousing risk.
As a result while there is a proliferation of different trading venues the market impact of trading in different places can be very varied. Furthermore, structural changes and the increased automation of markets have led to the introduction of high-frequency trading (HFT) into the FX market.
Some HFT strategies are specifically designed to monitor market activity for signs of larger orders being placed. This can mean that observable liquidity is not always available and order placing needs to be managed to prevent signalling risk.
In some respects it is the growth in automated trading and HFT that has driven the increased demand for more algorithmic execution as clients look for ways to keep their orders confidential, helping to minimise market impact.
Alongside regulatory and customer pressures, these drivers combined with the current world of relatively low investment returns and low market volatility all combine to promote algorithmic execution.
We live in a time when saving a few basis points of execution costs can make a real difference. Spending time to determine the right execution approach and analysing post trade transaction costs become an integral part of the investment process.
The contents of this document are indicative and are subject to change without notice. This document is intended for your sole use on the basis that before entering into this, and/or any related transaction, you will ensure that you fully understand the potential risks and return of this, and/or any related transaction and determine it is appropriate for you given your objectives, experience, financial and operational resources, and other relevant circumstances. You should consult with such advisers as you deem necessary to assist you in making these determinations. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V or an affiliated entity (‘RBS’) will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser or owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on RBS for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. RBS makes no representations or warranties with respect to the information and disclaims all liability for any use you or your advisers make of the contents of this document. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not lawfully be disclaimed. RBS and its affiliates, connected companies, employees or clients may have an interest in financial instruments of the type described in this document and/or in related financial instruments. Such interest may include dealing in, trading, holding, or acting as market-makers in such instruments and may include providing banking, credit and other financial services to any company or issuer of securities or financial instruments referred to herein.
RBS is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority, in Hong Kong by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, in Singapore by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, in Japan by the Financial Services Agency of Japan, in Australia by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority ABN 30 101 464 528 (AFS Licence No. 241114) and in the US, by the New York State Banking Department and the Federal Reserve Board. The financial instruments described in this document are made in compliance with an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the US Securities Act of 1933. In the United States, securities activities are undertaken by RBS Securities Inc., which is a FINRA/SIPC member and subsidiary of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB.
The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., incorporated in the Netherlands with limited liability. Registered with the Chamber of Commerce in The Netherlands, No. 33002587.
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc is in certain jurisdictions an authorised agent of The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. and The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. is in certain jurisdictions an authorised agent of The Royal Bank of Scotland plc.