BPO: The risks of faster trade finance
A faster way to pay suppliers marks a new era for international trade as it helps companies unlock working capital and improve cash flow. Bank Payment Obligations (BPOs) are one tool among many though, so companies should think carefully about when to use them.
|Manoj Menon, Global head of trade services, innovation & customer proposition, RBS|
BPOs are a clear sign of the overall direction international trade finance is taking – more automation leading to greater efficiency. The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and global financial messaging giant SWIFT believe they will play a key role in supporting the future development of international trade. They are a payment obligation between banks that involves exchanging data electronically. This enables faster, cheaper payments and better capital management, and they can be used to cover the underlying risk or finance the amount owed.
Businesses started looking at them more closely as an alternative means of trade settlement last year when they were endorsed by the ICC, which issued a set of rules on them – the Uniform Rules for Bank Payment Obligation (URBPO).
Companies and industries with advanced supply chains – strong links between buyer and seller and technology systems in place – have already started thinking carefully about BPOs. Early indicators show interest mounting in the energy and commodities sectors in particular.
BPOs are, however, just one trade payment mechanism or trade finance tool among many — including letters of credit (L/Cs) and guarantees. How useful they are depends heavily on the relationship between the buyer and seller.
Their main advantage is that they are based on the exchange of data rather than documents, which underpin the majority of today’s largely paper-based trade.
They therefore might be right when there is a long-standing relationship between trading partners – so they trust each other – and they want to move away from the time-consuming process of ploughing through documents. On the other hand, less documentation means more risk if anything goes wrong.
We’ve seen the consequences of ignoring such risks before. L/Cs and open account trade were the traditional tools for conducting international trade until about 10 years ago when companies moved towards a direct open account system. This involved buyers agreeing terms and paying when they received the goods, with no banks taken on to cover any shortfall if a problem arose.
Fiercely competitive export markets meant foreign buyers pressed exporters for this form of financing because it was so straightforward. But the financial crisis exposed the inherent risks involved when a payment could not be made. Corporates operating in the open account space moved back to more secure instruments such as L/Cs and guarantees.
SWIFT set up BPOs as a more secure form of open account trade that could still streamline the process.
When using a BPO, a buyer’s bank commits to paying a specific amount to the seller’s bank if the trade data they submit to a central platform successfully matches up.
That platform is the Transaction Matching Application (TMA) set up by SWIFT. Banks need to subscribe to this to offer BPO services.
It matches data between banks to the preagreed rules automatically. Consistency is ensured through the use of a ‘dictionary’ of common data. It is based on the XML ISO 20022 trade services management message type (TSMT).
The benefits of BPOs
For the seller:
Faster release of buyer’s funds once it’s shown that the seller has shipped the goods. This means faster payments, accelerated cash flow and lower Days Sales Outstanding
Less expensive than letters of credit thanks to reduced banking and handling fees
No presentation of physical documents required — it takes less time and resources
Provides collateral for accessing preshipment and post-shipment finance
Can extend credit terms to a buyer since their bank is now guaranteeing their payment obligation
Possibility of spreading the risk with multiple buyers
Improved customer offering with more flexible options — which could lead to winning additional business
For the buyer:
Better payment terms can be negotiated by providing a payment assurance to suppliers
Achieve early payment to the supplier to make use of discounts or rebates
Free up banking credit lines thanks to shorter, automated transaction cycles
Make payments on time and avoid physical supply disruption or judicial proceedings
Cut confirmation, vetting, presentation, and discrepancy fees
Increase business opportunities with suppliers
When to use a BPO
Companies might want to use a BPO for their domestic or international trade transactions when they:
Trade with long-term partners using letters of credit and want to switch to something more efficient
Conduct open account transactions today but want to cover the risk or arrange financing
Want to extend credit terms so they can try to create new business, or take better advantage of terms such as rebates or discounts
Deal with trading partners who are moving away from paper or proprietary systems
Work with new partners and therefore face a greater risk of non-payment – they can use the BPO to cover that risk if they don’t want to use a letter of credit
No representation, warranty, or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this document and no member of the RBS Group accepts any obligation to any recipient to update or correct any information contained herein. This document is published for information purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues. Views expressed herein are not intended to be and should not be viewed as advice or as a recommendation. You should take independent advice in respect of issues that are of concern to you.
This document does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, nor a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that is capable of acceptance to form a contract. The products and services described in this document may be provided by any member of the RBS Group, subject to signing appropriate contractual documentation. No member of the RBS Group shall be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages, including lost profits arising in any way from the information contained in this communication.
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (RBS plc) is registered in Scotland No. 90312 with its Registered Office at 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. It is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. (RBS NV) is authorised by De Nederlandsche Bank and is regulated by the Autoriteit Financiele Markten for the conduct of business in The Netherlands. RBS plc is in certain jurisdictions an authorised agent of RBS NV and RBS NV is in certain jurisdictions an authorised agent of RBS plc.
RBS plc or RBS NV is authorised and regulated in Hong Kong by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, in Singapore by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, in Japan by the Financial Services Agency of Japan, in Australia by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority ABN 30 101 464 528 (AFS Licence No. 241114) and in the US by the New York Department of Financial Services, the State of Connecticut Department of Banking, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. In the United States, securities activities are undertaken by RBS Securities Inc., which is a FINRA/SIPC member and a subsidiary of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.
Copyright 2013 RBS plc. All rights reserved. The daisy device logo, RBS, and The Royal Bank of Scotland are trade marks of RBS plc and the RBS Group Members. This communication is for the use of intended recipients only and the contents may not be reproduced, redistributed, or copied in whole or in part for any purpose without RBS’ prior express consent.