ING and the Dutch government pass taxpayers the bill

ING has always protested that its portfolio of alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities was of much better underlying quality than many of the sub-prime deals that imploded at the start of this credit downturn in 2007.

Groundhog day: Geithner botches another bailout

Should taxpayers own the good banks?

Jan Hommen: positive impact

Jan Hommen: positive impact

When the Dutch bank first secured a €10 billion capital injection from the Dutch government in October 2008, it was already exploring ways to ring-fence its exposure to further potential losses on this portfolio but hadn’t developed the right methodology for this. Then came the awful results of the fourth quarter of 2008, bringing further impairments on a portfolio of illiquid securities held for sale that the bank had to mark to a distressed price in a thin market.

Access intelligence that drives action

To unlock this research, enter your email to log in or enquire about access