Against the tide: From villains to saviours: the big bank scam

The big banks’ Mlec fund might well unblock the present credit log jam. But there’s no escaping the fact that global liquidity has contracted and capital is being repriced upwards.

The plan of the big US money centre banks

to set up a fund to buy mortgage-backed

securities from hedge funds and bank conduits

aims to relieve the log jam in credit markets.

But it is also a scam to get the banks out of a

mess of their own creation.

It might work and free up credit markets.

But it won’t reverse the contraction of global

liquidity and the rising cost of capital in the

longer term. We are set for slower liquidity

growth, providing little room for further asset

price inflation (whether in equities, emerging

markets or commodities).

“Put more than one capitalist in a room and

what you get is not competition, but conspiracy

to defraud the public” – to paraphrase Adam

Smith. The latest attempt by the world’s mega

banks is a neat example of such a situation.

The very villains who created the mess have

now turned saints who want to save the

world from a folly that is of their own making.

They are putting together a $75 billion fund,

the Orwellian-sounding master (!) liquidity

enhancement conduit, or Mlec.

Mlec might relieve the log jam of lousy bank

assets in special purpose vehicles and the overleveraged

state of the asset-backed commercial

paper market. But the real purpose is to save

the skins of the very idiots who, together with

irresponsible central bankers, danced the

wild fandango and now hope to live to dance

another day.

In reality, their heads should roll – and so

they already have at Merrill Lynch and Citi.

So should the heads of central bankers who

wittered on about not being able to control

leverage-financial asset bubbles. That is, until

after they retire and write hypocritical I-toldyou-

so books. Of course, like the cigar-smoking

fat men in the smoke-filled rooms of Marxist

caricature, many of these global captains

of finance will probably give themselves

absolution and survive to sin again.

The Mlec structure they propose is smart

in two ways and this might ensure its

success. First, it creates a mechanism for the

transmission of liquidity being provided by

central banks to the smaller SPVs and other

leveraged players that it could not reach until

now.

These small players didn’t have any access

to the discount window or to free money being

thrown at markets by central banks. They relied

in normal times on banks and debt markets for

finance. Once the markets dried up, so did their

source of funding.

 

Since the August crisis, central bank liquidity

injections have been pent up behind the walls

of fearful banks that

wouldn’t even lend

to each other in the

short-term inter-bank

market. The central

banks were powerless

because the liquidity

they provided was

not getting lent onto

where the locus of

the problem was.

Mlec will deliver the

liquidity to the core of

the problem.

But this will only

happen if a price can be agreed for liquidation

of the lousy assets held by the SPVs and other

leveraged owners. This is where the second

smart characteristic of Mlec appears and, with

it, the word conspiracy re-enters the equation.

The bankers want to minimize the writedowns

of assets they will buy through Mlec for

fear they will have to write down the assets of

their own SPVs as they reintermediate them.

Many of the current owners of assets that Mlec

will target are both insolvent and illiquid. They

will be only too happy to oblige: the higher the

price at which they sell their assets to Mlec the

less pain they (and the banks that own Mlec)

will have to endure.

The stage is set for a US Treasury-backed

scam of the first order. The credit crisis will

eventually pass but not its consequences. The

biggest consequence is the repricing of risk. In

the future, it will cause liquidity growth to be

much closer to nominal GDP expansion, leaving

little for asset price inflation.

This will happen because credit will only

grow as permitted by the capacity of banks’

balance sheets. There will be much less

creation of securitized debt. And because loans

will stay on banks’ balance sheets, risk will be

more accurately priced (that is, money will cost

more on average).

What central banks and mega banks are

doing cannot reverse this contraction of the

liquidity cycle. The contracting financial

economy will drive the global economy close

to recession (with the US being in it) next year.

When that happens, the price of all assets that

are real economic growth counters will fall.

Among the most vulnerable will be emerging

market assets (debt and equity), global

equities, hard commodities and energy.