One key clause in Uruguay’s proposed collective action clauses closes a loophole that Mexico left open in its own bonds: the question of whether the issuer could use exit consents on the payment terms of bonds with CACs. Exit consents, even on non-payment terms of bonds, are generally considered coercive and rather bad manners, even if a necessary evil for countries seeking to restructure their bonds.
Exit consents are used when a country is trying to get bondholders to switch out of a set of old bonds and into a set of new bonds.
Access intelligence that drives action
To unlock this research, enter your email to log in or enquire about access