Regulation: Basel’s big exam

Proposals from Basel to reform the bank capital adequacy framework have triggered a wide-reaching debate on the nature of bank capital, liquidity and valuation. A hasty conclusion could waste some valuable new thinking.

If the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s proposals for a new capital adequacy framework were applied raw tomorrow, they would be a disaster. Nearly everyone agrees about that.

But the draft of that framework, unleashed on the banking sector in June last year, has certainly stimulated active thought. Bankers, regulators and credit analysts have wrestled with the conundrum: how do you get a fair assessment of a credit portfolio, in order to apply a capital charge to it, consistent enough to encourage a level playing field?

Credit rating agencies at first expected a bonanza, with a heavy increase in demand for their services.

Access intelligence that drives action

To unlock this research, enter your email to log in or enquire about access