Regulation: An uneven regulatory playing field
Euromoney Limited, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15236090
4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Euromoney Limited 2024
Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Foreign Exchange

Regulation: An uneven regulatory playing field

CFTC and NFA are being inconsistent with the rules for futures and forex traders.

Back in 1974, when the US Congress established the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to regulate futures trading, there was no retail foreign exchange trading industry. Even as recently as 2000, when Congress enacted the Commodities Trading Modernization Act (CTMA), the question of who would oversee non-bank trading of FX, other than on the regulated exchanges, was not only unclear, it had probably not even been asked. A year later, Congress attempted to resolve the issue. In its Treasury Amendment, it stated that the CFTC had the mandate to protect retail customers trading in what it called off-exchange FX futures.

At the same time that the CFTC was created, Congress also authorized the formation of registered futures associations to give the futures industry the opportunity to regulate itself. This led to the formation of the National Futures Association, to which the CFTC effectively outsourced regulation.

As a result of the CTMA, all non-bank firms serving as FX market makers – retail platforms such as Oanda, Gain, FXCM and others – effectively came under the CFTC’s and NFA’s jurisdictions if they wanted to operate in the US.

According to Michael Stumm, founder and joint chief executive of Oanda, most of the NFA’s new forex dealer members welcomed the introduction of regulation.

Gift this article