RMB Internationalization: Change, alignment, and maturity
China has never been more important to foreign investors and the pace of liberalization in the country’s financial markets continues to accelerate. With MSCI’s inclusion of China A-shares into its emerging markets index and the launch of Bond Connect, we are nearing a critical point in the journey towards the complete opening of China’s financial markets to global investors.
Regional Head of Securities Services for Greater China and Northeast Asia
China: A core priority
The newly released 2017 Standard Chartered RMB Investors Forum Survey, which comprised of 900 global market participants, found that 60% of respondents indicated investing in China was one of their top three priorities, while 69% planned to increase their exposures over the next 12 months. Strong GDP growth, more settled market conditions, diminished concerns about capital controls, credit market maturity, regulatory clarity and a stabilized RMB were all significant impetuses for this positive investor sentiment.
Government and sovereign entities have been increasing their investments into China, since the inclusion of the RMB into the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) basket in 2016, in order to manage their RMB liquidity.
Liberalized FX hedging rules have attracted insurers to the domestic fixed income market. Regulatory guidelines oblige insurers to lengthen the duration of their bond holdings, forcing them to identify highly liquid, long-dated instruments which generate returns and can be hedged in the same currency. Chinese bonds fit these criteria.
Investment managers are also increasingly optimistic about China. This appetite from fund managers is primarily a result of improved market conditions, investor demand for China exposure and simplified access channels into the country’s sizeable fixed income and equity markets. More than 75% of fixed income investor respondents to the survey said volumes would increase in the next 12 months.
Identifying the correct access channel
Accessing China is not a science but an artistic skill in navigating a wide range of channels available to international institutions. In 2016, Standard Chartered predicted that Stock Connect would overtake QFII (Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor) as the most commonly used scheme for equity managers to access China.1
Stock Connect reforms – namely the inclusion of Shenzhen and the removal of the aggregate quota limits – have also helped drive investor interest with 40.4% of organizations saying they would grow their China investments through the scheme.
Foreign exposure to Chinese fixed income is low but this is changing under the China Interbank Bond Market reforms (CIBM). At the time of our survey in March 2017, some 12.3% of respondents said that the CIBM was their preferred access channel and over a third were evaluating CIBM as a means by which to grow their China investments. This has been enabled through FX hedging rule changes, with a number of institutions in Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan all expressing bullish sentiment that these amendments will prompt greater flows into the CIBM market either directly or via the Bond Connect.
The emergence of new channels begs the question as to what will happen to the traditional China access routes such as QFII and RMB Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (RQFII). Both schemes remain popular, but the survey found that just 1.9% of respondents would use QFII as an access channel moving forward, while only 50% of the quotas on average are being used by foreign investors. As the pool of foreign investors in China grows, it is likely these newer allocators will increasingly pivot towards Stock Connect and CIBM at the expense of QFII and RQFII.
In spite of the significant development of these channels, the use of offshore ‘dim sum’ bonds as a means of gaining Chinese exposure via the ‘security’ and familiarity of Hong Kong remains highly popular, with more than 17% of investors opting for this route currently. USD-denominated bonds issued by Chinese companies also present investors with the opportunity to gain exposure to the market without the ongoing FX risks or associated hedging costs.
What is left to address?
We still need to make structural and operational reforms in anticipation of the impact that MSCI and subsequent bond index inclusions will have over the next 12 to 24 months. Stock Connect has a daily quota of Rmb13 billion, prompting one fund manager at the RMB Forum in Hong Kong to warn that trading freezes and repatriation risks made it hard for passive funds to enter the market. This is also a problem for daily-dealing Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS).
Uncertainty over trade settlement has only been partially resolved through the establishment of the Special Segregated Account (SPSA) structure although key UCITS’ regulators point out it does not offer true Delivery Versus Payment (DVP). “In place of real-time DVP, the market creates a 4.5 hour window of potential exposure for investors, which was originally deemed to run counter to the intent and spirit of UCITS V,” said one regional market specialist.
Equally, RQFII and QFII have long been beset by issues around taxation. The handling of withholding tax for QFII and RQFII managers has been an issue which has only increased in importance since the launch of Stock Connect. Stock Connect is currently temporarily exempted from withholding tax. However, QFII and RQFII investors are increasingly unsure about whether to continue accruing for withholding tax, or if they need to prepare for an unwinding of their previous accruals.
Perhaps not surprisingly, given the continuing growth in the number and complexity of access mechanisms, Standard Chartered’s survey highlighted an increasing desire for alignment and simplification in the China Access story. This could take many forms, including merging QFII and RQFII rules entirely, removing legacy mechanisms, or allowing for investments across multiple channels to become fungible. However, there is little evidence so far to suggest this is likely to be a focus in the immediate future.
On the horizon
The reformist agenda is continuing at an incredible pace with the launch of Bond Connect at the beginning of July, which provides international investors with simplified access to CIBM bonds directly from Hong Kong, removing the need to open custody and bank accounts in China.
The scheme has begun to attract interest from investors who are new to China or are exploring the market, but do not want to commit to having a direct relationship onshore. Relatedly, the survey found that 27.4% of respondents said they were likely to use Bond Connect in the next 12 to 24 months.
All of these reforms help to increase our readiness ahead of the massive asset transitions that we are about to see going into China. With around $16-18 billion of assets expected to enter into Chinese equities through the MSCI inclusion and a further $225 billion likely to flow into domestic bonds following various bond index inclusions, the hardest work is yet to come.
Barnaby Nelson is Regional Head of Securities Services, Greater China and North East Asia, for Transaction Banking at Standard Chartered. In this role, he leads the end-to-end delivery of Standard Chartered Securities Services proposition in several of the bank’s largest custody businesses across product development, sales, client servicing and operations
Barnaby is also responsible for driving the business agenda among institutional investor and financial intermediary clients across North East Asia and Greater China, with a focus on supporting clients’ growth aspirations across Asia, Africa and the Middle East. Barnaby joined the bank from BNP Paribas, where he was Head of Client Development - Asia for the Securities Services division. Prior to this, he worked as Business Owner for Thomson Reuters’ information and market data feeds in Asia-Pacific.
This material has been prepared by Standard Chartered Bank (SCB), a firm authorised by the United Kingdom’s Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. It is not independent research material. This material has been produced for information and discussion purposes only and does not constitute advice or an invitation or recommendation to enter into any transaction.
Some of the information appearing herein may have been obtained from public sources and while SCB believes such information to be reliable, it has not been independently verified by SCB. Information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Any opinions or views of third parties expressed in this material are those of the third parties identified, and not of SCB or its affiliates.
SCB does not provide accounting, legal, regulatory or tax advice. This material does not provide any investment advice. While all reasonable care has been taken in preparing this material, SCB and its affiliates make no representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness, and no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors of fact, omission or for any opinion expressed herein. You are advised to exercise your own independent judgment (with the advice of your professional advisers as necessary) with respect to the risks and consequences of any matter contained herein. SCB and its affiliates expressly disclaim any liability and responsibility for any damage or losses you may suffer from your use of or reliance on this material.
SCB or its affiliates may not have the necessary licenses to provide services or offer products in all countries or such provision of services or offering of products may be subject to the regulatory requirements of each jurisdiction. This material is not for distribution to any person to which, or any jurisdiction in which, its distribution would be prohibited.
You may wish to refer to the incorporation details of Standard Chartered PLC, Standard Chartered Bank and their subsidiaries at http://www.standardchartered.com/en/incorporation-details.html.