Asia’s ESG market needs balance
Asiamoney is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024
Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Asia’s ESG market needs balance

As more and more issuers jump on the environmental, social and governance bandwagon, it raises important questions.

Bamboo-stones-2040340_1920.jpg

What do the chicken-producer Japfa Comfeed, Delhi International Airport, Chinese mobile phone-maker Xiaomi, renewables company Greenko Group and property developer Gemdale Corp have in common?

Followers of Asia’s sustainable debt market will easily recognize the link: all these firms, and others in their respective sectors, have sold some form of sustainable bond – green, social, sustainability or sustainability-linked – this year.

The boom in bond issuance tied to socially responsible investment (SRI) has been remarkable. As of the end August 2021, borrowers from Asia ex-Japan had raised $85.6 billion from 295 green, social or sustainability bonds, according to Dealogic, whereas in the whole of 2020, there were 215 deals worth $58.2 billion. Volumes so far this year are an impressive 127% higher than five years ago.

But as more and more issuers jump on the environmental, social and governance (ESG) bandwagon, it raises important questions.

How much green-washing or social-washing has contributed to the spike in bond volumes, especially from firms that are not explicitly operating in the renewable sector? Where should banks and investors draw the line in supporting these transactions? And perhaps most important, what’s next for the market?

Research

The answer really depends on who you ask.

One

Gift this article