The material on this site is for financial institutions, professional investors and their professional advisers. It is for information only. Please read our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy and Cookies before using this site.

All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2020 Euromoney, a part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.
Opinion

Who gains from algorithmic trading?

Investment banks need to think carefully about which institutions they market their services to.

The head of algorithmic trading at a leading investment bank recently expressed the following view: “If algorithmic trading is so fundamentally good because it gets such great results, then in any other industry there would have already been a massive swing towards it. The reason why it does not happen in investment banking is because customers just aren’t savvy enough. It is only the smarter customers, the more demanding ones, who are prepared to pay for it. It’s the stupid ones for whom price is everything.”

Is this just a condescending and self-serving argument – or does it have some truth?

Investment banks clearly have something to gain from algorithmic trading or they would not be pushing it so hard. They have spent millions over the years developing execution algorithms to increase automation within their trading desks, and fight off the effects of relentless commission squeezes. Offering some of these directly to clients helps them to recoup some of their investment.

Take out a complimentary trial

Take out a 7 day trial to gain unlimited access to Euromoney.com and Asiamoney.com analysis and receive expertly-curated updates direct to your inbox.

 

Already a user?

Login now

 

We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree