The material on this site is for financial institutions, professional investors and their professional advisers. It is for information only. Please read our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy and Cookies before using this site.

All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2020 Euromoney, a part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.

Breakingvews: Regulation is bad for the raters

Source: is Europe's leading financial commentary service.

Date: May 2003

Ratings agencies are under the regulatory spotlight. Moody's and Standard & Poor's were criticized for their role in the equity bubble: not spotting the likes of Enron in time. And now they are being criticized for their role in the post-bubble era: tipping companies over the edge by junking them too rapidly. In recent weeks a US congressional sub-committee has held hearings on the agencies, while the SEC published a consultation document on the industry. The implication of this activity is that the agencies need more regulation. But that's exactly the wrong conclusion - they need less.

This is not to say that the agencies have an unblemished record. Far from it. They have been slow to spot trouble. And they suffer from a big potential conflict of interest: the fact that their income comes from the companies they rate.

But what is the best way of improving the situation? Arguably to cut the red tape and expose the agencies to a more competitive market.

Take out a complimentary trial

Take out a 7 day trial to gain unlimited access to and analysis and receive expertly-curated updates direct to your inbox.


Already a user?

Login now


We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree