The material on this site is for financial institutions, professional investors and their professional advisers. It is for information only. Please read our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy and Cookies before using this site. Please see our Subscription Terms and Conditions.

All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 Euromoney, a part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.

Euromoney 30th anniversary: The state still rules the market

Laisser-faire never was quite what it seemed. It required a lot of state power to create and a lot of state power was acquired under the guise of free markets. The process hasn't finished yet. Globalization, far from undermining the nation state, is fostering stronger governments capable of standing up to the new forces. Laisser-faire is over, re-regulation has begun and welfare spending is about to rocket, especially in the emerging markets. The 21st century will witness more varied forms of capitalism than ever before, each with a differing role for the market and a strong role for the state, argues Brian Caplen

Euromoney 30th anniversary: Heroes and villains

To understand the future it is necessary to debunk the myths of the recent past. During the 1990s certain platitudes have been repeated so often by economists, entrepreneurs, politicians and journalists that they are now accepted as statements of fact. Every speechmaker inserts these clichés into their texts as if such references give credence to all other ideas they wish to relay.

The underpinning proposition goes something like this: laisser-faire capitalism has triumphed over all other types of economic system; free markets occur naturally and will flourish if left to their own devices; governments are reducing their role in economies; the welfare burden is being passed from the state to the individual; globalization is spreading the free market to the rest of the world; globalization is undermining the position of the nation state.

This article will argue that none of these assertions is borne out by the facts. It's not a question of whether markets are good or bad, or whether the best government is small or large, the problem is that the evidence to support the triumph-of-markets idea just isn't there.

Only when it is realized that markets are not the singular way of social organization, that governments are playing a larger role in economic and cultural life than ever before, and that globalization (in the sense of universal laisser-faire) is much less far reaching and less enduring than is widely thought, can anything useful be said about future trends.

You have reached premium content. Please log in to continue reading.

Read beyond the headlines with Euromoney

For over 50 years, our readers have looked to Euromoney to stay informed about the issues that matter in the international banking and financial markets. Find out more about our different levels of access below.


Unlimited access to and

Expert comment, long reads and in-depth analysis interviews with senior finance professionals

Access the results of our market-leading annual surveys across core financial services

Access the results of our annual awards, including the world-renowned Awards for Excellence

Your print copy of Euromoney magazine delivered monthly

£73.75 per month

Billed Annually


Unlimited access to and, including our top stories, long reads, expert analysis, and the results of our annual surveys and awards

Sign up to any of our newsletters, curated by our editors


Already a user?

We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree