Why fears over US Basel III implementation are overblown
Euromoney, is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024
Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Sponsored Content

Why fears over US Basel III implementation are overblown

Concerns are mounting the US will partially implement or stall the introduction of Basel III giving its banks and corporates a competitive advantage. Sherif Lotfi, Managing Director, Corporate Advisory at RBS, argues that impacts arising from one set of rules need to be considered alongside those of others before the full effect of regulatory changes can be judged.

Sherif Lotfi, Managing Director, Corporate Advisory at RBS

The US is implementing comprehensive reform in the form of the Dodd-Frank Act. There will be winners and losers. Among the former are companies with strong credit ratings and a large wallet who will feel less pain, regardless of their location, as their access to capital will be undiminished. Estimates vary as to how dramatic the impact of regulation might be. According to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) a wide range, from 20 basis points to 200 basis points, covers those on the increased cost of lending, while the toll on GDP growth is reckoned between 0.5 per cent and 3 per cent.

It is not surprising then to find some US politicians are putting pressure on the government to conduct a quantitative impact study to see how Basel III will affect the country’s banking sector and economy. The process has echoes of Basel II. The move to introduce that proceeded slowly and, according to the BIS, as of September last year had yet to be fully implemented in the US.

The Basel committee, which draws up the rules, cannot force Basel III on local regulators. No country is obliged to adopt them. There are questions over their implementation in the UK and Europe as well as the US. Deadlines have already come and gone and the implementation of some parts of Basel III have been delayed – often reflecting real business concerns.

Many are worried if the US fails to implement Basel III then its banks would clearly have a cost of capital very different from their European peers. In turn, this would allow its companies to benefit from lower financing costs than counterparts elsewhere in the world where the finance sector is under the Basel III yoke.

It is important, however, to look at the combined impact of regulations. Even if Basel III is not fully implemented in the US, the country’s regulators are introducing a myriad of others under the auspices of the Dodd-Frank Act, covering derivatives and proprietary trading (the Volcker Rule), consumer lending and the asset-backed market among others. These rules could be tougher than those imposed in Europe and elsewhere in the world.

In totality, the combined rules and the current economic reality are forcing banks to rethink their business models, which clients they serve, which services they provide and in which geographies they operate. Banks will try to increase their prices and fees, change their business mix towards those areas needing less capital and generating higher returns, while focusing on customers who need less capital and give the bank more business.

In many countries, companies with strong credit ratings will still enjoy liquidity in the bank markets and bond markets. Multinationals such as Caterpillar, P&G, Disney, Tesco and Vodafone will still be well served. Others, such as some smaller-to-mid-sized companies may suffer. Banks in the US and Europe have already started to be more selective in their clients and the products and services they provide.

Further, the combination of the weak economy, increased regulatory charges and concerns over impending regulations has made a number of capital markets less efficient because of lower liquidity. In the US bond markets, for example, inventories of primary dealers have fallen 75 per cent from their peak.

From a corporate perspective, it adds up to a reduced set of financial services that cost more. Although there are some factors, such as an increased investment in information technology, that can help lower costs, it is likely there will remain less flexibility in financial services.

Responses from banks will include investing in technology to provide more automation in order to drive down costs, while companies will look to emerging non-bank providers of financial services.

Whether the US implements Basel III in full or not, banking and corporate financing is set to undergo radical change. 

For more RBS Insight content, click here

.Disclaimer

The contents of this document are indicative and are subject to change without notice. This document is intended for your sole use on the basis that before entering into this, and/or any related transaction, you will ensure that you fully understand the potential risks and return of this, and/or any related transaction and determine it is appropriate for you given your objectives, experience, financial and operational resources, and other relevant circumstances. You should consult with such advisers as you deem necessary to assist you in making these determinations. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (“RBS”) will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser or owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on RBS for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. RBS makes no representations or warranties with respect to the information and disclaims all liability for any use you or your advisers make of the contents of this document. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not lawfully be disclaimed. Where the document is connected to Over The Counter (“OTC”) financial instruments you should be aware that OTC derivatives (“OTC Derivatives”) can provide significant benefits but may also involve a variety of significant risks. All OTC Derivatives involve risks which include (inter-alia) the risk of adverse or unanticipated market, financial or political developments, risks relating to the counterparty, liquidity risk and other risks of a complex character. In the event that such risks arise, substantial costs and/or losses may be incurred and operational risks may arise in the event that appropriate internal systems and controls are not in place to manage such risks. Therefore you should also determine whether the OTC transaction is appropriate for you given your objectives, experience, financial and operational resources, and other relevant circumstances.

RBS and its affiliates, connected companies, employees or clients may have an interest in financial instruments of the type described in this document and/or in related financial instruments. Such interest may include dealing in, trading, holding, or acting as market-makers in such instruments and may include providing banking, credit and other financial services to any company or issuer of securities or financial instruments referred to herein. RBS is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority, in Hong Kong by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, in Singapore by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, in Japan by the Financial Services Agency of Japan, in Australia by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority ABN 30 101 464 528 (AFS Licence No. 241114) and in the US, by the New York State Banking Department and the Federal Reserve Board. The financial instruments described in this document are made in compliance with an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In the United States, securities activities are undertaken by RBS Securities Inc., which is a FINRA/SIPC (www.sipc.org) member and subsidiary of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc. Dubai International Financial Centre: This material has been prepared by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and is directed at “Professional Clients” as defined by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). No other person should act upon it. The financial products and services to which the material relates will only be made available to customers who satisfy the requirements of a “Professional Client”. This document has not been reviewed or approved by the DFSA. Qatar Financial Centre: This material has been prepared by The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. and is directed solely at persons who are not “Retail Customer” as defined by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority. The financial products and services to which the material relates will only be made available to customers who satisfy the requirements of a “Business Customer” or “Market Counterparty”.

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc acts in certain jurisdictions as the authorised agent of The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V.

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

Gift this article