Turkey looks to diversify infrastructure debt

Turkey looks to diversify infrastructure debt

Banks not be able to shoulder the debt burden

Innovations in Wealth Management Technology Awards 2014

Innovations in Wealth Management Technology Awards 2014

The rise of new players with technology at their core

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Email a Friend

  • All fields are compulsory


Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.




Add Your Comment


  • All fields are compulsory
  • All comments are subject to editorial review as we are subject to the same regulations adhered to in publishing our own content. For this reason, your comment may not be live immediately, or may not be published.









Brilliant Bob Diamond’s luck finally runs out

It was Diamond’s hubris that ultimately triggered his untimely demise as Barclays' CEO, tarnishing a uniquely successful 16-year career as the architect of a global investment banking franchise. But his successor inherits a banking diamond that needs an awful lot of polishing.


Bob Diamond is a brilliant banker, one of the most successful of his generation. Diamond has also been a lucky banker. Today, he exhausted his reserves of good fortune.

Tied to luck is judgment. For all his qualities, Diamond’s judgment has often been questionable. He’s survived that failing on numerous previous occasions, but not this time.

Over the past 48 hours, stories started to leak that Barclays would try to pin some of the blame for its role in the Libor scandal on the Bank of England – that, in some way, the Bank was complicit in allowing banks to report much lower interbank funding costs at the height of the financial crisis because of the fear that, if the real rates were revealed, it would lead to a run on the banks.

Those leaks came as no surprise to Euromoney. It was a line we’d heard from various Barclays insiders as soon as the fine against the bank was announced last week.

Yesterday, it was further speculated – probably leaked – that Diamond planned to bring the Bank of England’s involvement up during his appearance at the Commons Treasury Select Committee on Wednesday.

For a board that had up to that point been supportive of Diamond – chairman Marcus Agius even threw himself under the proverbial bus to try to protect his CEO – this was probably the final straw.

 
Diamond should have taken a page from the Jamie Dimon playbook. As soon as the JPMorgan CIO losses were fully revealed, Dimon did not mince his words. He blamed himself. He blamed the bank. He didn’t point the finger elsewhere. He fired the people directly responsible. He was scathing in his assessment of his own institution’s ineptitude. It probably pained him to do it, but it worked – Dimon came out of a Congressional hearing with his reputation enhanced and his position as strong as before, despite losses that could reach $5 billion.

Diamond and Barclays made some of the right noises. But they also made some ill-judged ones as well – none more so than to seemingly threaten to involve the UK’s central bank.

“Sorry. We messed up.” That’s all Diamond needed to say. Fire the people responsible. That’s what Diamond needed to do.

When he didn’t, the board was left with little choice but to ditch the horse it had backed so strongly. This is not a time to be fighting regulators or politicians. That’s why, less than 24 hours after Diamond wrote perhaps the longest letter to employees in history, setting out exactly what he was going to do to restore Barclays’ reputation, he finds himself out of a job.

What’s next for Barclays?

Barclays now finds itself in the extraordinary position of having a chairman who has already resigned as acting CEO. What a mess. Agius resigned to try to staunch the blood flowing from his then chief executive’s office. It was never going to work – not when the front pages of tabloids such as The Sun were calling for Diamond’s head.

Who takes over? In fact, what comes first – a new chairman or a new CEO? You’d have thought any chairman worth his salt would want to have the final say in the appointment of his new chief executive – and the new chairman of Barclays will need a cellar-full of credibility and experience if he or she is to turn things round quickly.

For chief executive, it is not easy to find strong internal candidates: Rich Ricci, head of the investment bank, is another US investment banker, like Bob; Jerry del Missier, who, just a few days before the Libor fine was announced, moved out of the investment bank to become group COO, may be Canadian but will be viewed similarly. But he is expected to follow Diamond out of the bank.

Both del Missier and Ricci are incredibly close to Diamond. Ricci needs to be persuaded to stay on. He is loyal to the institution, and he will know that the last thing his friend and mentor will want to see, now he has left, is the institution fall apart.

Tom Kalaris is another Diamond acolyte who grew up through the investment bank, but has since made a strong impression in the less controversial world of wealth management. He’s a classy individual who would probably do a good job, but may still be too close to Bob.

The other internal candidate would be Antony Jenkins, chief executive of retail and business banking. He’s British and not an investment banker, which might give him a head start. He is seen by many as a solid, reliable business leader – but the trouble is, not by many of the people at the old Barclays Capital that now dominates the group. At Euromoney, we’ve heard various sneering appraisals of Jenkins’ credentials for group CEO when we’ve mentioned his name to traders and investment bankers. Could Jenkins keep the group together and harness the investment bank?

  Page 1 of 2  Next | Single Page