February 2010

SEPA migration: A lame duck struggles to make common sense

After hundreds of millions of euros of investment, banks are finding that the EU’s single payments area (SEPA) is not the promised land. Early adopters think the blame lies with politicians and want them to save Sepa by forcing through migration. Laurence Neville reports on a flawed but not failed initiative.


NOT LONG AGO the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa) was seen as the triumphant culmination of the introduction of the euro and the realization of a true single market. Now Sepa is regarded by many as a lame-duck initiative that has failed to deliver benefits for corporates and consumers and that has cost banks hundreds of millions of euros in wasted technology development and running costs.

Across transaction banking – now a core component of many banks’ business strategies following the financial crisis – there are murmurings of discontent. Some industry veterans even privately wish for the destruction of the Sepa project, such has been the scale of the distraction it has caused for banks at a time when corporates need all the help they can get to improve working capital management.

Certainly the European Union political establishment, which decided in the Lisbon Agenda in 2000 to harmonize payment...


The rest of this article is available to subscribers only

Please Subscribe or take a Free Trial below.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.