<b>The great league table debate</b>
Euromoney, is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024
Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
BANKING

<b>The great league table debate</b>

Headline: The great league table debate
Source: Euromoney
Date: June 2001

Overall Debt arrangers
Western European Borrowers
Asian Borrowers
Latin America Borrowers
Global airline/aerospace borrowers
Global automotive borrowers
Global financial services borrower





Global corporate borrowers
Global energy borrowers
Global pharmaceutical borrowers
Global sovereign borrowers
Global telecoms borrowers
Global utilities borrowers






With banks increasingly consolidating or at least cross-linking their debt-arranger activities, Euromoney has concluded that its annual bond, loan and MTN rankings should appear as a single table. In this introduction to the results, Jennifer Morris looks at the ways in which boundaries between different areas of debt are becoming blurred and assesses the challenge to investment banks’ core business from commercial banks

Bankers can’t make up their minds about league tables. Sometimes they don’t seem to count for very much. It’s common knowledge that lead arranger data can be sliced and diced in myriad ways depending on which version of the truth a particular sales pitch demands. In fact, manipulating the figures has become so widespread that those involved no longer bother to deny it. “There are ways around every league table rule,” says the head of debt capital markets at one US bank.

But try changing the ground rules – as Euromoney has this month by combining bond, loan and MTN tables into one all-encompassing debt-arranger ranking – and suddenly the league tables matter – and matter a lot.








Gift this article