The dramatic events in Asia, Russia and Brazil have generated a torrent of comment about exchange rates, hot money, exchange controls, currency boards, "dollarization" and the need for a new global financial architecture, most of it half-baked or dead wrong. Let's try to unravel the good from the bad.
Follow Friedman
If only developing countries could produce sound money, hot money would cool down and become less volatile. Exchange-rate crises of the type that have battered emerging markets during the past two years would find their way into the dustbin. In his 1972 Horwitz Lectures, Nobel prize-winner Milton Friedman presented a clear diagnosis of the currency problem facing developing countries and a correct prescription.
Friedman concluded that any developing country with a central bank was doomed. He recommended dumping central banking and either unifying a national currency with a strong currency via an orthodox currency board system or via official...
You must be a trialist or subscriber to view this content
Please Subscribe or take a Free Trial below.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
Subscribe online today
- Euromoney magazine in print
- Unlimited access to Euromoney.com
- Over a decade of archived content
- All the latest industry news, analysis and commentary
- Access to all our survey and award results
- More than 30 specialist supplements a year
- Personalised email news feeds
Subscribe
Free 48 hour access
- Online access to Euromoney.com
- Comment and in-depth analysis of the international capital markets
- The best of our editorial comment by email
- Complimentary digital magazine sample
Start Trial
Questions about your subscription status?
Email us or call: +44 (0) 20 7779 8888