Change font size:   

 
The US treasury market reaches breaking point

The US treasury market reaches breaking point

The structural issue that could cause the world's market of last resort to grind to a halt

No. 6: If you don’t give it to me you’ll only lend it to someone else and look where that got us

January 2003

Inventiveness keeps deals flowing


CEE issues have innovated on several fronts this year. Bulgaria made Europe’s first Brady exchange, Poland revived sterling sovereign issues and Gazprom launched Russia’s biggest ever domestic corporate bond.




Bulgaria braves new ground
Borrower: Bulgaria
Deal type: Brady exchange
Deal amount: $2.2 billion
Advisers: JPMorgan, Citigroup

Sovereign debt exchanges can be politically controversial. So they are often only considered by a government that is either fairly secure in its power, or - like Argentina - is desperate. So some were surprised that Bulgaria's government, after only a year in power, would want to take the risk of undertaking Europe's first Brady exchange, particularly when both the finance minister and his deputy are former investment bankers and so perhaps easy targets for populist accusations of access capitalism.

Krassimer Katev, Bulgaria's deputy finance minister and a former emerging-market trader at Paribas, Daiwa Europe and AIG Asset Management, says: "Obviously we took some calculated risks. It's quite difficult politically to perform flexible debt restructuring, because all transactions related to the public debt have to be passed through government. So the opposition obviously attacked the measure, and tried to make short-term political gains out of it. They actually challenged the transaction in the constitutional court. The president got involved. It was high political drama."

But ultimately finance minister Milen Velchev and Katev managed to bring Bulgarians round to the benefits of doing a swap. Observers attest to their intelligence, articulateness and obvious love of their country. This can, however, translate into an impatience with alternative views. Katev says: "The swap was a no-brainer. I knew we should do it from the very beginning. Anyone who doesn't see the benefits is either too indecisive or too stupid."

Katev has a point. The deal makes obvious sense. Bulgaria's Brady debt was collateralized on US treasury slips, which were sitting unused. This was a sleeping asset, worth some $330 million, that Bulgaria could convert into cash if it exchanged the Bradys for pure Bulgarian debt.

This tallied well with the government objective of increasing the size of its fiscal reserve account, which Velchev wanted in order to give the government security against market vagaries such as less-than-expected revenues from privatizations or worsening global economic conditions.

From the point of view of the lead managers - liability management veterans JPMorgan and Citigroup, which have worked on debt swaps for Mexico, Argentina, Venezuela, Peru and others - the challenge was to get as many investors as possible on board.

As Jonathan Brown, managing director at JPMorgan, says: "A risk was that people were comfortable in their Brady debt. They'd only sell if they felt enough other people were selling, otherwise there'd be no liquidity in the new bonds." It was something of a confidence game, as with all bond exchanges, involving persuading the investors to let go of the devil they know in favour of the devil they don't.

Usually, at least in such crisis situations as Argentina's 2001 debt swaps, investors are persuaded by an increase in interest rates. But the interest rates stayed stable on this deal, and what persuaded investors was partly the poor liquidity on the Brady debt, partly the lure of new benchmark bonds, partly the distant promise of EU accession, granting Bulgaria the protection previously supplied by the US government. The ability of JPMorgan and Citigroup to persuade big-fish investors such as Pimco and DWS to swim with the exchange also helped.

The minimum target for the exchange would have been $1 billion. In fact, Bulgaria ended up exchanging $2.2 billion in two deals, one in March and one in September, and in the first deal exchanged e835 million of the Brady debt into euro debt. The swap was thus not just the first public Brady exchange in Europe - it was also the first exchange to swap dollar for euro debt. The banks also structured the deal to give Bulgaria longer maturities than the Brady debt, and a better yield curve in dollars and euros. Bulgaria launched a 2015 dollar benchmark and a 2013 euro-denominated bond (which joined the existing 2007 euro benchmark, issued in November 2001 and also lead-managed by JPMorgan). All in all, in both swaps, it exchanged around 50% of the Brady debt for new debt.

Swapping into euros obviously made sense in the long term because of the country's planned accession to the EU. But in the short term it also enabled some US investors, looking for yields more usual for emerging-market assets, to exit Bulgarian debt, and some special EU convergence funds, such as DWS and Deka, to buy it.

Bulgaria was thus enabled to sell the US treasury slips and increase its fiscal reserve account to more than e2 billion. This played a major part in the upgrade in outlook by both Standard &Poor's and Fitch to positive, on the BB rating of Bulgaria. Fitch's sovereign report of October 2002 said: "Brady bond exchanges have improved the currency, interest rate and maturity profile of the debt. Moreover, Bulgaria benefits from a fiscal reserve equal to around 1.7 times total 2003 public debt service, and strong external liquidity." The report says these "significant improvements" make another upgrade likely in the next two years.

This - in addition to the other upgrades over the past year, means "investors holding Bulgarian debt have had a very good year", as Brown at JPMorgan puts it. The banks haven't done badly either, earning 0.55% fees on the first, $1.4 billion, deal and 0.325% on the second, $800 million, deal. That's nearly $11 million in total.

And politically, the domestic press coverage was not too bad. The country is now in a good position financially for the foreseeable future. As Katev says: "The coming year will probably be very boring as a result of our prudent measures, as we can refrain from net borrowing, unless we achieve better ratings or can borrow at much better rates, though we do want to continue to aggressively reduce our public debt."





Poland's bond proves sterling
Borrower: Poland
Deal type: Sovereign issue
Deal amount: £400 million
Lead manager: UBS Warburg

Poland is one of eastern Europe's most frequent and innovative borrowers, and its funding requirements mean it is likely to remain so in the next few years. In some ways, it is the Italy of the converging states - it needs to borrow regularly but has a strong treasury team who use innovative multi-currency deals and liability management programmes.

  Page 1 of 3  Next | Single Page






When he joins the firm in early 2009’... that’s being optimistic! There may not be a firm in early 2009

One wag’s cynical interpretation of Carsten Kengeter’s appointment as the new head of FICC at UBS. He is scheduled to join in the early part of 2009, according to a press release

Ruromoney Jobs Post a job