The Russian government's long-term energy strategy
to 2020 was sent to the Cabinet for discussion last month and
should be approved before the summer holidays. The
development of the energy sector remains a priority for the
Kremlin, accounting for half the economy and just over
three-quarters of stock market capitalization.
"Russia will always be primarily a raw materials exporter. It is
where Russia's competitive advantage lies and despite the efforts
to diversify the economy the Kremlin will never lose sight of the
importance of these resources to Russia's future development," says
Rory MacFarquar, an economist with Goldman Sachs.
President Vladimir Putin's administration has developed a habit
of consistently under-estimating Russia's progress. The draft is
short on detail and modest in its predictions but lays out a plan
for steady improvement and a more efficient, market-oriented
Russia.
The strategy offers a pessimistic and an optimistic long-term
projection for oil and gas output and the investment required.
Having languished at about 6 million barrels per day (bpd) for most
of the past decade, oil output growth is expected to reach 8.9
million to 9.8 million bpd by 2010 and 9 million to 10.4 million
bpd by 2020. This compares with the 8.1 million bpd expected by the
end of this year, says deputy prime minister Viktor Khristenko.
The oil companies' own estimates are significantly more
optimistic and already easily outstripped the energy ministry's
last guess at growth rates in 1999. Since then annual oil
production growth has been running at 7% to 10% a year while the
leading companies have put in double-digit gains for most of the
past four years.
The energy ministry's estimate for gas production may be closer
to the mark as the bulk of Russia's gas is produced by state-owned
Gazprom: Khristenko estimates gas production growth of 635 billion
to 665 billion cubic metres (bcm) by 2010 and 680 to 730 bcm by
2020, against the 595.3 bcm produced in 2002.
The energy ministry is expecting the biggest gains to come from
more efficient energy use. Companies never had to pay for power in
the past and waste huge amounts of energy: Russia uses twice the
amount of power per unit of production than the US.
More significant than the numbers is the fact that the
government is attempting long-term planning in the first place.
With the worst economic problems already solved, growth has forced
the Kremlin to focus on upgrading the country's infrastructure.
Thanks to the massive growth in oil production the oil export
pipeline network is at full capacity.
A stretched network
"Pipelines are the key issue for Russia
and can be used to control oil production. Russia is already
producing enough to meet its domestic needs and all the excess
will be exported," says Kaha Iknovalitsa, an oil and gas
analyst with Troika Dialog. "The existing network is already
struggling to meet the demand for space."
Here the energy strategy is more decisive and ambitious. The
Blue Stream sub-Black Sea gas pipeline supplying Turkey with
Russian gas went on stream at the start of the year and a plan to
build another gas pipeline to northern Europe via Poland is well in
hand. Both pipelines will complement the Soviet-era gas pipeline to
eastern Europe running through the Ukraine.
At the same time Russia's state-owned oil pipeline monopolist
Transneft has begun ambitious expansion plans for the Baltic
Pipeline System (BPS). In March Transneft vice-president Sergei
Grigoriev said the company was in the final stages of negotiating
$1 billion of financing to boost BPS's capacity from 240,000 bpd to
840,000 bpd and bring Transneft's total export capacity to over 4
million bpd.
The strategy also gave the go-ahead to two new pipelines that
will open new strategic markets to Russian crude exports. After
initially casting scorn on the idea of privately owned pipelines,
prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov gave the nod in April to one being
built to link Russian supply with Daqing in China and in May
another to Murmansk in the northwest of Russia.
The $2.5 billion Chinese pipeline will carry about 600,000 bpd
and the $4 billion to $5 billion Murmansk pipeline about 2 million
bpd. Together they will double Transneft's export capacity as well
as opening up the Chinese and American markets to Russian crude oil
exports for the first time. And the document hints that a more
ambitious pipeline to Nakhodka on the Pacific coast will eventually
be built that would open Japan to Russian oil exports.
One disappointment was the lack of detail on restructuring the
gas sector. In principle a wholesale gas market is supposed to be
created by 2005 and a retail market by 2006/07 but the energy
strategy was ominously silent on how the gas market reforms should
proceed.
"There has been no official decision on what to do with Gazprom
and because of all the infighting it is too early to say which way
it will go - remaining a state foreign policy tool or being broken
up," says Troika Dialog's Iknovalitsa. "But it is clearly not in
Putin's interests to escalate the fighting and nothing will happen
until maybe after the elections."
However, the strategy calls for gas tariffs to be increased.
Gazprom currently charges $21.50 per 1,000 cubic metres, but will
be able to charge $40 to $45 by 2006, and $59 to $64 by 2020. Given
the Kremlin's habit of underestimating targets, analysts are
sceptical about the strategy's guesses.
"The tariff hikes in the strategy are very modest," says Stephen
O'Sullivan, head of research at United Financial Group. "I suspect
there is a lot of politics behind the estimates. No-one wants to
call for big tariff hikes on the eve of an election. We estimate
that Russia will reach the strategy's 2010 tariff levels as early
as 2006."