Cookie Information: 
In common with most websites, this site uses cookies to carry out various tasks including improving our users' experience.

Cookies are pieces of information which include a unique reference code that a website transfers to your device.

For information about your cookie options including turning them off, click here.

To carry on with cookies running, click proceed or click the X to close this window and continue browsing. You can review your cookie options at any time by clicking on the Cookies link at the foot of each page



 
Euromoney’s 2012 FX survey results

Euromoney’s 2012 FX survey results

Access the results now

EuromoneyFXNews.com

EuromoneyFXNews.com

Sign up to receive free alerts from our foreign exchange news service

April 2005

Email a Friend

  • All fields are compulsory


To include more than one recipient, please separate each email address with a semi-colon ';'





Add Your Comment


  • All fields are compulsory
  • All comments are subject to editorial review as we are subject to the same regulations adhered to in publishing our own content. For this reason, your comment may not be live immediately, or may not be published.






I have read and agree to the Terms and Conditions





Strategic failures


Academic research into delivery failures in the US cash equity and options market support the idea that prior to Reg SHO, market makers deliberately failed to deliver securities in a strategic way.


Leslie Boni, an economist at the University of New Mexico, wrote a paper entitled "Strategic delivery failures in US equity markets" while a visiting financial economist at the SEC last autumn. Boni found that most US equity issues experience at least a small percentage of failures-to-deliver every day. On average failed shares account for just 0.15% of the outstanding shares of listed companies and 0.91% of unlisted shares. Some 42% of listed stock issues and 47% of unlisted stock issues, have persistent fails of five days or more.

Any clearing member with a failure to receive position has the option of asking the NSCC to force a "buy in" on its position. Buy-ins, however are rarely requested. In a 2003 paper, Wharton and University of North Carolina economists found that options market makers with cash equity failures-to-deliver were only bought-in in 86 of the 69,063 transactions examine, or just 0.12% of cases.

Academics argue that persistent fails are primarily due to market makers strategically failing to deliver because the data show that the likelihood of persistent fails in a stock increases with its borrowing cost. Persistent fails, they note, are also more likely when a stock is illiquid. The likelihood of persistent fails in a security also increases if it has options listed because option market makers can hold short stock positions for longer than equity market makers.








Download the Free Euromoney iPad app today